|
Possible
Determinants of
Chimpanzee Longevity in Zoos
Virginia Landau, Jessie
Grenfell, Erica Metelovski and James E. King,
The Jane Goodall Institute and the University of Arizona
Chimpanzees have been
exotic attractions for curious people visiting zoos for nearly 100
years. During that time, housing and husbandry methods for chimpanzees
have changed from barren cages to glass and concrete enclosures to
modern attempts to replicate the natural environment of chimpanzees.
Changes in the methods of daily care and improved medical techniques
have accompanied advancements in housing.
A study was designed to determine the extent to which improved housing and
husbandry techniques have increased the longevity of chimpanzees over the last
55 years. Survival data on 749 chimpanzees were extracted from the Chimpanzoo
database and analyzed by the product limit survival procedure. The analysis
showed markedly longer survival times for chimpanzees born after 1940 than
for those born before 1940. Mortality during the first year of life was extremely
high both before and after 1940. The form of the survivability function for
those more recently born chimpanzees mirrors that for human populations during
the middle part of the eighteenth century when medical science contributed
virtually nothing to longevity. The vast majority of chimpanzees born after
1940 were born in the past 20 years. Therefore even with improved daily and
medical care and more appropriate housing, chimpanzees still show alarmingly
high mortality rates after their first year o life. The longevity hazard function
showed that the greater likelihood of dying occurred early and late in the
Chimppanzee life span. Male mortality was higher than female mortality at all
ages independent of year of birth.
Keepers of older chimpanzees
believe that the stability of the keeper staff and the environment
and presence of a relative or friend were important in prolonging
life. Examination of the data showed that the more transfers the
chimpanzee experienced the more likely it was to survive. This may
be caused by the fact that very old, sick, or depressed chimpanzees
are not candidates for transfer or it may be that a new environment
increased the probability of a longer life span.
Abstracted from a paper
delivered at the 17th Congress of International Primatological Society
at the University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.
|